Flow-Cut Gaps and Face Covers in Planar Graphs
November 06, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Robert Krauthgamer, James R. Lee, Havana Rika
arXiv ID
1811.02685
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
math.MG
Citations
13
Venue
ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
The relationship between the sparsest cut and the maximum concurrent multi-flow in graphs has been studied extensively. For general graphs with $k$ terminal pairs, the flow-cut gap is $O(\log k)$, and this is tight. But when topological restrictions are placed on the flow network, the situation is far less clear. In particular, it has been conjectured that the flow-cut gap in planar networks is $O(1)$, while the known bounds place the gap somewhere between $2$ (Lee and Raghavendra, 2003) and $O(\sqrt{\log k})$ (Rao, 1999). A seminal result of Okamura and Seymour (1981) shows that when all the terminals of a planar network lie on a single face, the flow-cut gap is exactly $1$. This setting can be generalized by considering planar networks where the terminals lie on $Ξ³>1$ faces in some fixed planar drawing. Lee and Sidiropoulos (2009) proved that the flow-cut gap is bounded by a function of $Ξ³$, and Chekuri, Shepherd, and Weibel (2013) showed that the gap is at most $3Ξ³$. We prove that the flow-cut gap is $O(\logΞ³)$, by showing that the edge-weighted shortest-path metric induced on the terminals admits a stochastic embedding into trees with distortion $O(\logΞ³)$, which is tight. The preceding results refer to the setting of edge-capacitated networks. For vertex-capacitated networks, it can be significantly more challenging to control flow-cut gaps. While there is no exact vertex-capacitated version of the Okamura-Seymour Theorem, an approximate version holds; Lee, Mendel, and Moharrami (2015) showed that the vertex-capacitated flow-cut gap is $O(1)$ on planar networks whose terminals lie on a single face. We prove that the flow-cut gap is $O(Ξ³)$ for vertex-capacitated instances when the terminals lie on at most $Ξ³$ faces. In fact, this result holds in the more general setting of submodular vertex capacities.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted