Every Testable (Infinite) Property of Bounded-Degree Graphs Contains an Infinite Hyperfinite Subproperty

November 07, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Hendrik Fichtenberger, Pan Peng, Christian Sohler arXiv ID 1811.02937 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 14 Venue ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
One of the most fundamental questions in graph property testing is to characterize the combinatorial structure of properties that are testable with a constant number of queries. We work towards an answer to this question for the bounded-degree graph model introduced in [Goldreich, Ron, 2002], where the input graphs have maximum degree bounded by a constant $d$. In this model, it is known (among other results) that every \emph{hyperfinite} property is constant-query testable [Newman, Sohler, 2013], where, informally, a graph property is hyperfinite, if for every $Ξ΄>0$ every graph in the property can be partitioned into small connected components by removing $Ξ΄n$ edges. In this paper we show that hyperfiniteness plays a role in \emph{every} testable property, i.e. we show that every testable property is either finite (which trivially implies hyperfiniteness and testability) or contains an infinite hyperfinite subproperty. A simple consequence of our result is that no infinite graph property that only consists of expander graphs is constant-query testable. Based on the above findings, one could ask if every infinite testable non-hyperfinite property might contain an infinite family of expander (or near-expander) graphs. We show that this is not true. Motivated by our counter-example we develop a theorem that shows that we can partition the set of vertices of every bounded degree graph into a constant number of subsets and a separator set, such that the separator set is small and the distribution of $k$-disks on every subset of a partition class, is roughly the same as that of the partition class if the subset has small expansion.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted