Testing local properties of arrays

November 19, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Omri Ben-Eliezer arXiv ID 1811.07448 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DM, math.CO Citations 12 Venue Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex. Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We study testing of local properties in one-dimensional and multi-dimensional arrays. A property of $d$-dimensional arrays $f:[n]^d \to Ξ£$ is $k$-local if it can be defined by a family of $k \times \ldots \times k$ forbidden consecutive patterns. This definition captures numerous interesting properties. For example, monotonicity, Lipschitz continuity and submodularity are $2$-local; convexity is (usually) $3$-local; and many typical problems in computational biology and computer vision involve $o(n)$-local properties. In this work, we present a generic approach to test all local properties of arrays over any finite (and not necessarily bounded size) alphabet. We show that any $k$-local property of $d$-dimensional arrays is testable by a simple canonical one-sided error non-adaptive $\varepsilon$-test, whose query complexity is $O(Ξ΅^{-1}k \log{\frac{Ξ΅n}{k}})$ for $d = 1$ and $O(c_d Ξ΅^{-1/d} k \cdot n^{d-1})$ for $d > 1$. The queries made by the canonical test constitute sphere-like structures of varying sizes, and are completely independent of the property and the alphabet $Ξ£$. The query complexity is optimal for a wide range of parameters: For $d=1$, this matches the query complexity of many previously investigated local properties, while for $d > 1$ we design and analyze new constructions of $k$-local properties whose one-sided non-adaptive query complexity matches our upper bounds. For some previously studied properties, our method provides the first known sublinear upper bound on the query complexity.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted