Machine Learning at the Wireless Edge: Distributed Stochastic Gradient Descent Over-the-Air
January 03, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Mohammad Mohammadi Amiri, Deniz Gunduz
arXiv ID
1901.00844
Category
cs.DC: Distributed Computing
Cross-listed
cs.IT,
cs.LG
Citations
59
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
We study federated machine learning (ML) at the wireless edge, where power- and bandwidth-limited wireless devices with local datasets carry out distributed stochastic gradient descent (DSGD) with the help of a remote parameter server (PS). Standard approaches assume separate computation and communication, where local gradient estimates are compressed and transmitted to the PS over orthogonal links. Following this digital approach, we introduce D-DSGD, in which the wireless devices employ gradient quantization and error accumulation, and transmit their gradient estimates to the PS over a multiple access channel (MAC). We then introduce a novel analog scheme, called A-DSGD, which exploits the additive nature of the wireless MAC for over-the-air gradient computation, and provide convergence analysis for this approach. In A-DSGD, the devices first sparsify their gradient estimates, and then project them to a lower dimensional space imposed by the available channel bandwidth. These projections are sent directly over the MAC without employing any digital code. Numerical results show that A-DSGD converges faster than D-DSGD thanks to its more efficient use of the limited bandwidth and the natural alignment of the gradient estimates over the channel. The improvement is particularly compelling at low power and low bandwidth regimes. We also illustrate for a classification problem that, A-DSGD is more robust to bias in data distribution across devices, while D-DSGD significantly outperforms other digital schemes in the literature. We also observe that both D-DSGD and A-DSGD perform better by increasing the number of devices (while keeping the total dataset size constant), showing their ability in harnessing the computation power of edge devices.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Distributed Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Reproducing GW150914: the first observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
MXNet: A Flexible and Efficient Machine Learning Library for Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence with Edge Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
iFogSim: A Toolkit for Modeling and Simulation of Resource Management Techniques in Internet of Things, Edge and Fog Computing Environments
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted