An Automatic Speedup Theorem for Distributed Problems

February 26, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sebastian Brandt arXiv ID 1902.09958 Category cs.DC: Distributed Computing Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 65 Venue ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Recently, Brandt et al. [STOC'16] proved a lower bound for the distributed LovΓ‘sz Local Lemma, which has been conjectured to be tight for sufficiently relaxed LLL criteria by Chang and Pettie [FOCS'17]. At the heart of their result lies a speedup technique that, for graphs of girth at least $2t+2$, transforms any $t$-round algorithm for one specific LLL problem into a $(t-1)$-round algorithm for the same problem. We substantially improve on this technique by showing that such a speedup exists for any locally checkable problem $Ξ $, with the difference that the problem $Ξ _1$ the inferred $(t-1)$-round algorithm solves is not (necessarily) the same problem as $Ξ $. Our speedup is automatic in the sense that there is a fixed procedure that transforms a description for $Ξ $ into a description for $Ξ _1$ and reversible in the sense that any $(t-1)$-round algorithm for $Ξ _1$ can be transformed into a $t$-round algorithm for $Ξ $. In particular, for any locally checkable problem $Ξ $ with exact deterministic time complexity $T(n, Ξ”) \leq t$ on graphs with $n$ nodes, maximum node degree $Ξ”$, and girth at least $2t+2$, there is a sequence of problems $Ξ _1, Ξ _2, \dots$ with time complexities $T(n, Ξ”)-1, T(n, Ξ”)-2, \dots$, that can be inferred from $Ξ $. As a first application of our generalized speedup, we solve a long-standing open problem of Naor and Stockmeyer [STOC'93]: we show that weak $2$-coloring in odd-degree graphs cannot be solved in $o(\log^* Ξ”)$ rounds, thereby providing a matching lower bound to their upper bound.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Distributed Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted