TurkScanner: Predicting the Hourly Wage of Microtasks
March 17, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ The Web Conference
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Susumu Saito, Chun-Wei Chiang, Saiph Savage, Teppei Nakano, Tetsunori Kobayashi, Jeffrey Bigham
arXiv ID
1903.07032
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
34
Venue
The Web Conference
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Workers in crowd markets struggle to earn a living. One reason for this is that it is difficult for workers to accurately gauge the hourly wages of microtasks, and they consequently end up performing labor with little pay. In general, workers are provided with little information about tasks, and are left to rely on noisy signals, such as textual description of the task or rating of the requester. This study explores various computational methods for predicting the working times (and thus hourly wages) required for tasks based on data collected from other workers completing crowd work. We provide the following contributions. (i) A data collection method for gathering real-world training data on crowd-work tasks and the times required for workers to complete them; (ii) TurkScanner: a machine learning approach that predicts the necessary working time to complete a task (and can thus implicitly provide the expected hourly wage). We collected 9,155 data records using a web browser extension installed by 84 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers, and explored the challenge of accurately recording working times both automatically and by asking workers. TurkScanner was created using ~150 derived features, and was able to predict the hourly wages of 69.6% of all the tested microtasks within a 75% error. Directions for future research include observing the effects of tools on people's working practices, adapting this approach to a requester tool for better price setting, and predicting other elements of work (e.g., the acceptance likelihood and worker task preferences.)
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted