Instance and Output Optimal Parallel Algorithms for Acyclic Joins
March 22, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Xiao Hu, Ke Yi
arXiv ID
1903.09717
Category
cs.DB: Databases
Citations
21
Venue
ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Massively parallel join algorithms have received much attention in recent years, while most prior work has focused on worst-optimal algorithms. However, the worst-case optimality of these join algorithms relies on hard instances having very large output sizes, which rarely appear in practice. A stronger notion of optimality is {\em output-optimal}, which requires an algorithm to be optimal within the class of all instances sharing the same input and output size. An even stronger optimality is {\em instance-optimal}, i.e., the algorithm is optimal on every single instance, but this may not always be achievable. In the traditional RAM model of computation, the classical Yannakakis algorithm is instance-optimal on any acyclic join. But in the massively parallel computation (MPC) model, the situation becomes much more complicated. We first show that for the class of r-hierarchical joins, instance-optimality can still be achieved in the MPC model. Then, we give a new MPC algorithm for an arbitrary acyclic join with load $O ({\IN \over p} + {\sqrt{\IN \cdot \OUT} \over p})$, where $\IN,\OUT$ are the input and output sizes of the join, and $p$ is the number of servers in the MPC model. This improves the MPC version of the Yannakakis algorithm by an $O (\sqrt{\OUT \over \IN} )$ factor. Furthermore, we show that this is output-optimal when $\OUT = O(p \cdot \IN)$, for every acyclic but non-r-hierarchical join. Finally, we give the first output-sensitive lower bound for the triangle join in the MPC model, showing that it is inherently more difficult than acyclic joins.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Databases
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
The Case for Learned Index Structures
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Untangling Blockchain: A Data Processing View of Blockchain Systems
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Converting Static Image Datasets to Spiking Neuromorphic Datasets Using Saccades
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
BLOCKBENCH: A Framework for Analyzing Private Blockchains
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Data Synthesis based on Generative Adversarial Networks
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted