A rearrangement distance for fully-labelled trees

April 02, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Giulia Bernardini, Paola Bonizzoni, Gianluca Della Vedova, Murray Patterson arXiv ID 1904.01321 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 9 Venue Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The problem of comparing trees representing the evolutionary histories of cancerous tumors has turned out to be crucial, since there is a variety of different methods which typically infer multiple possible trees. A departure from the widely studied setting of classical phylogenetics, where trees are leaf-labelled, tumoral trees are fully labelled, i.e., \emph{every} vertex has a label. In this paper we provide a rearrangement distance measure between two fully-labelled trees. This notion originates from two operations: one which modifies the topology of the tree, the other which permutes the labels of the vertices, hence leaving the topology unaffected. While we show that the distance between two trees in terms of each such operation alone can be decided in polynomial time, the more general notion of distance when both operations are allowed is NP-hard to decide. Despite this result, we show that it is fixed-parameter tractable, and we give a 4-approximation algorithm when one of the trees is binary.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted