Information Leakage in Encrypted Deduplication via Frequency Analysis: Attacks and Defenses

April 11, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Transactions on Storage

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jingwei Li, Patrick P. C. Lee, Chufeng Tan, Chuan Qin, Xiaosong Zhang arXiv ID 1904.05736 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.DC Citations 46 Venue ACM Transactions on Storage Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Encrypted deduplication combines encryption and deduplication to simultaneously achieve both data security and storage efficiency. State-of-the-art encrypted deduplication systems mainly build on deterministic encryption to preserve deduplication effectiveness. However, such deterministic encryption reveals the underlying frequency distribution of the original plaintext chunks. This allows an adversary to launch frequency analysis against the ciphertext chunks and infer the content of the original plaintext chunks. In this paper, we study how frequency analysis affects information leakage in encrypted deduplication storage, from both attack and defense perspectives. Specifically, we target backup workloads, and propose a new inference attack that exploits chunk locality to increase the coverage of inferred chunks. We further combine the new inference attack with the knowledge of chunk sizes and show its attack effectiveness against variable-size chunks. We conduct trace-driven evaluation on both real-world and synthetic datasets and show that our proposed attacks infer a significant fraction of plaintext chunks under backup workloads. To defend against frequency analysis, we present two defense approaches, namely MinHash encryption and scrambling. Our trace-driven evaluation shows that our combined MinHash encryption and scrambling scheme effectively mitigates the severity of the inference attacks, while maintaining high storage efficiency and incurring limited metadata access overhead.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted