Metrics for Graph Comparison: A Practitioner's Guide

April 16, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› bioRxiv

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Peter Wills, Francois G. Meyer arXiv ID 1904.07414 Category stat.AP Cross-listed cs.SI, physics.data-an, q-bio.NC Citations 193 Venue bioRxiv Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
Comparison of graph structure is a ubiquitous task in data analysis and machine learning, with diverse applications in fields such as neuroscience, cyber security, social network analysis, and bioinformatics, among others. Discovery and comparison of structures such as modular communities, rich clubs, hubs, and trees in data in these fields yields insight into the generative mechanisms and functional properties of the graph. Often, two graphs are compared via a pairwise distance measure, with a small distance indicating structural similarity and vice versa. Common choices include spectral distances (also known as $ฮป$ distances) and distances based on node affinities. However, there has of yet been no comparative study of the efficacy of these distance measures in discerning between common graph topologies and different structural scales. In this work, we compare commonly used graph metrics and distance measures, and demonstrate their ability to discern between common topological features found in both random graph models and empirical datasets. We put forward a multi-scale picture of graph structure, in which the effect of global and local structure upon the distance measures is considered. We make recommendations on the applicability of different distance measures to empirical graph data problem based on this multi-scale view. Finally, we introduce the Python library NetComp which implements the graph distances used in this work.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” stat.AP

R.I.P. ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted

Forecasting: theory and practice

Fotios Petropoulos, Daniele Apiletti, ... (+78 more)

stat.AP ๐Ÿ› International Journal of Forecasting ๐Ÿ“š 481 cites 5 years ago

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted