$Ξ±$-Logarithmic negativity

April 23, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Xin Wang, Mark M. Wilde arXiv ID 1904.10437 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cond-mat.stat-mech, cs.IT, hep-th, math-ph Citations 29 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
The logarithmic negativity of a bipartite quantum state is a widely employed entanglement measure in quantum information theory, due to the fact that it is easy to compute and serves as an upper bound on distillable entanglement. More recently, the $ΞΊ$-entanglement of a bipartite state was shown to be the first entanglement measure that is both easily computable and has a precise information-theoretic meaning, being equal to the exact entanglement cost of a bipartite quantum state when the free operations are those that completely preserve the positivity of the partial transpose [Wang and Wilde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(4):040502, July 2020]. In this paper, we provide a non-trivial link between these two entanglement measures, by showing that they are the extremes of an ordered family of $Ξ±$-logarithmic negativity entanglement measures, each of which is identified by a parameter $Ξ±\in[ 1,\infty] $. In this family, the original logarithmic negativity is recovered as the smallest with $Ξ±=1$, and the $ΞΊ$-entanglement is recovered as the largest with $Ξ±=\infty$. We prove that the $Ξ±$-logarithmic negativity satisfies the following properties: entanglement monotone, normalization, faithfulness, and subadditivity. We also prove that it is neither convex nor monogamous. Finally, we define the $Ξ±$-logarithmic negativity of a quantum channel as a generalization of the notion for quantum states, and we show how to generalize many of the concepts to arbitrary resource theories.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted