Representation Similarity Analysis for Efficient Task taxonomy & Transfer Learning

April 26, 2019 ยท Entered Twilight ยท ๐Ÿ› Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

๐ŸŒ… TWILIGHT: Old Age
Predates the code-sharing era โ€” a pioneer of its time

"Last commit was 5.0 years ago (โ‰ฅ5 year threshold)"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Repo contents: README.md, RSA_analysis, taskonomy

Authors Kshitij Dwivedi, Gemma Roig arXiv ID 1904.11740 Category cs.CV: Computer Vision Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.LG Citations 164 Venue Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Repository https://github.com/kshitijd20/RSA-CVPR19-release โญ 27 Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
Transfer learning is widely used in deep neural network models when there are few labeled examples available. The common approach is to take a pre-trained network in a similar task and finetune the model parameters. This is usually done blindly without a pre-selection from a set of pre-trained models, or by finetuning a set of models trained on different tasks and selecting the best performing one by cross-validation. We address this problem by proposing an approach to assess the relationship between visual tasks and their task-specific models. Our method uses Representation Similarity Analysis (RSA), which is commonly used to find a correlation between neuronal responses from brain data and models. With RSA we obtain a similarity score among tasks by computing correlations between models trained on different tasks. Our method is efficient as it requires only pre-trained models, and a few images with no further training. We demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our method for generating task taxonomy on Taskonomy dataset. We next evaluate the relationship of RSA with the transfer learning performance on Taskonomy tasks and a new task: Pascal VOC semantic segmentation. Our results reveal that models trained on tasks with higher similarity score show higher transfer learning performance. Surprisingly, the best transfer learning result for Pascal VOC semantic segmentation is not obtained from the pre-trained model on semantic segmentation, probably due to the domain differences, and our method successfully selects the high performing models.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computer Vision