New reduction rules for the tree bisection and reconnection distance

May 04, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Annals of Combinatorics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Steven Kelk, Simone Linz arXiv ID 1905.01468 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed q-bio.PE Citations 12 Venue Annals of Combinatorics Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Recently it was shown that, if the subtree and chain reduction rules have been applied exhaustively to two unrooted phylogenetic trees, the reduced trees will have at most 15k-9 taxa where k is the TBR (Tree Bisection and Reconnection) distance between the two trees, and that this bound is tight. Here we propose five new reduction rules and show that these further reduce the bound to 11k-9. The new rules combine the ``unrooted generator'' approach introduced in [Kelk and Linz 2018] with a careful analysis of agreement forests to identify (i) situations when chains of length 3 can be further shortened without reducing the TBR distance, and (ii) situations when small subtrees can be identified whose deletion is guaranteed to reduce the TBR distance by 1. To the best of our knowledge these are the first reduction rules that strictly enhance the reductive power of the subtree and chain reduction rules.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted