Secure and Utility-Aware Data Collection with Condensed Local Differential Privacy

May 15, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mehmet Emre Gursoy, Acar Tamersoy, Stacey Truex, Wenqi Wei, Ling Liu arXiv ID 1905.06361 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.DB Citations 87 Venue IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Local Differential Privacy (LDP) is popularly used in practice for privacy-preserving data collection. Although existing LDP protocols offer high utility for large user populations (100,000 or more users), they perform poorly in scenarios with small user populations (such as those in the cybersecurity domain) and lack perturbation mechanisms that are effective for both ordinal and non-ordinal item sequences while protecting sequence length and content simultaneously. In this paper, we address the small user population problem by introducing the concept of Condensed Local Differential Privacy (CLDP) as a specialization of LDP, and develop a suite of CLDP protocols that offer desirable statistical utility while preserving privacy. Our protocols support different types of client data, ranging from ordinal data types in finite metric spaces (numeric malware infection statistics), to non-ordinal items (OS versions, transaction categories), and to sequences of ordinal and non-ordinal items. Extensive experiments are conducted on multiple datasets, including datasets that are an order of magnitude smaller than those used in existing approaches, which show that proposed CLDP protocols yield high utility. Furthermore, case studies with Symantec datasets demonstrate that our protocols accurately support key cybersecurity-focused tasks of detecting ransomware outbreaks, identifying targeted and vulnerable OSs, and inspecting suspicious activities on infected machines.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted