The Stabilized Explicit Variable-Load Solver with Machine Learning Acceleration for the Rapid Solution of Stiff Chemical Kinetics
May 21, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Kyle Buchheit, Opeoluwa Owoyele, Terry Jordan, Dirk Van Essendelft
arXiv ID
1905.09395
Category
physics.comp-ph
Cross-listed
cs.DC,
cs.GR,
cs.LG,
cs.PF
Citations
4
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
In this study, a fast and stable machine-learned hybrid algorithm implemented in TensorFlow for the integration of stiff chemical kinetics is introduced. Numerical solutions to differential equations are at the core of computational fluid dynamics calculations. As the size and complexity of the simulations grow, so does the need for computational power and time. Many efforts have been made to implement stiff chemistry solvers on GPUs but have not been highly successful because of the logical divergence in traditional stiff solver algorithms. Because of these constrains, a novel Explicit Stabilized Variable-load (STEV) solver has been developed. Overstepping due to the relatively large time steps is prevented by introducing limits to the maximum changes of chemical species per time step. To prevent oscillations, a discrete Fourier transform is introduced to dampen ringing. In contrast to conventional explicit approaches, a variable-load approach is used where each cell in the computational domain is advanced with its unique time step. This approach allows cells to be integrated simultaneously while maintaining warp convergence but finish at different iterations and be removed from the workload. To improve the computational performance of the introduced solver, specific thermodynamic quantities of interest were estimated using shallow neural networks in place of polynomial fits, leading to an additional 10% savings in clock time with minimal training and implementation requirements. However ML specific hardware could increase the time savings to as much as 28%. While the complexity of these particular machine learning models is not high by modern standards, the impact on computational efficiency should not be ignored. The results show a dramatic decrease in total chemistry solution time (over 200 times) while maintaining a similar degree of accuracy.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ physics.comp-ph
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Potential Molecular Dynamics: a scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Heterogeneous Parallelization and Acceleration of Molecular Dynamics Simulations in GROMACS
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
By-passing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Machine Learning of coarse-grained Molecular Dynamics Force Fields
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Towards Physics-informed Deep Learning for Turbulent Flow Prediction
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted