On the Use of Randomness in Local Distributed Graph Algorithms

June 02, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mohsen Ghaffari, Fabian Kuhn arXiv ID 1906.00482 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DC Citations 9 Venue ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We attempt to better understand randomization in local distributed graph algorithms by exploring how randomness is used and what we can gain from it: - We first ask the question of how much randomness is needed to obtain efficient randomized algorithms. We show that for all locally checkable problems for which polylog $n$-time randomized algorithms exist, there are such algorithms even if either (I) there is a only a single (private) independent random bit in each polylog $n$-neighborhood of the graph, (II) the (private) bits of randomness of different nodes are only polylog $n$-wise independent, or (III) there are only polylog $n$ bits of global shared randomness (and no private randomness). - Second, we study how much we can improve the error probability of randomized algorithms. For all locally checkable problems for which polylog $n$-time randomized algorithms exist, we show that there are such algorithms that succeed with probability $1-n^{-2^{\varepsilon(\log\log n)^2}}$ and more generally $T$-round algorithms, for $T\geq$ polylog $n$, that succeed with probability $1-n^{-2^{\varepsilon\log^2T}}$. We also show that polylog $n$-time randomized algorithms with success probability $1-2^{-2^{\log^\varepsilon n}}$ for some $\varepsilon>0$ can be derandomized to polylog $n$-time deterministic algorithms. Both of the directions mentioned above, reducing the amount of randomness and improving the success probability, can be seen as partial derandomization of existing randomized algorithms. In all the above cases, we also show that any significant improvement of our results would lead to a major breakthrough, as it would imply significantly more efficient deterministic distributed algorithms for a wide class of problems.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted