Assessing the Quality of the Steps to Reproduce in Bug Reports

June 17, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Oscar Chaparro, Carlos Bernal-Cardenas, Jing Lu, Kevin Moran, Andrian Marcus, Massimiliano Di Penta, Denys Poshyvanyk, Vincent Ng arXiv ID 1906.07107 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 79 Venue ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
A major problem with user-written bug reports, indicated by developers and documented by researchers, is the (lack of high) quality of the reported steps to reproduce the bugs. Low-quality steps to reproduce lead to excessive manual effort spent on bug triage and resolution. This paper proposes Euler, an approach that automatically identifies and assesses the quality of the steps to reproduce in a bug report, providing feedback to the reporters, which they can use to improve the bug report. The feedback provided by Euler was assessed by external evaluators and the results indicate that Euler correctly identified 98% of the existing steps to reproduce and 58% of the missing ones, while 73% of its quality annotations are correct.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Software Engineering

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted