Surrogate Models for Enhancing the Efficiency of Neuroevolution in Reinforcement Learning

July 22, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors JΓΆrg Stork, Martin Zaefferer, Thomas Bartz-Beielstein, A. E. Eiben arXiv ID 1907.09300 Category cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary Citations 12 Venue Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
In the last years, reinforcement learning received a lot of attention. One method to solve reinforcement learning tasks is Neuroevolution, where neural networks are optimized by evolutionary algorithms. A disadvantage of Neuroevolution is that it can require numerous function evaluations, while not fully utilizing the available information from each fitness evaluation. This is especially problematic when fitness evaluations become expensive. To reduce the cost of fitness evaluations, surrogate models can be employed to partially replace the fitness function. The difficulty of surrogate modeling for Neuroevolution is the complex search space and how to compare different networks. To that end, recent studies showed that a kernel based approach, particular with phenotypic distance measures, works well. These kernels compare different networks via their behavior (phenotype) rather than their topology or encoding (genotype). In this work, we discuss the use of surrogate model-based Neuroevolution (SMB-NE) using a phenotypic distance for reinforcement learning. In detail, we investigate a) the potential of SMB-NE with respect to evaluation efficiency and b) how to select adequate input sets for the phenotypic distance measure in a reinforcement learning problem. The results indicate that we are able to considerably increase the evaluation efficiency using dynamic input sets.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Neural & Evolutionary

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey

Klaus Greff, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, ... (+3 more)

cs.NE πŸ› IEEE TNNLS πŸ“š 6.0K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted