Almost Shortest Paths with Near-Additive Error in Weighted Graphs
July 26, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Michael Elkin, Yuval Gitlitz, Ofer Neiman
arXiv ID
1907.11422
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
17
Venue
Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Let $G=(V,E,w)$ be a weighted undirected graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, and fix a set of $s$ sources $S\subseteq V$. We study the problem of computing {\em almost shortest paths} (ASP) for all pairs in $S \times V$ in both classical centralized and parallel (PRAM) models of computation. Consider the regime of multiplicative approximation of $1+Ξ΅$, for an arbitrarily small constant $Ξ΅> 0$ . In this regime existing centralized algorithms require $Ξ©(\min\{|E|s,n^Ο\})$ time, where $Ο< 2.372$ is the matrix multiplication exponent. Existing PRAM algorithms with polylogarithmic depth (aka time) require work $Ξ©(\min\{|E|s,n^Ο\})$. Our centralized algorithm has running time $O((m+ ns)n^Ο)$, and its PRAM counterpart has polylogarithmic depth and work $O((m + ns)n^Ο)$, for an arbitrarily small constant $Ο> 0$. For a pair $(s,v) \in S\times V$, it provides a path of length $\hat{d}(s,v)$ that satisfies $\hat{d}(s,v) \le (1+Ξ΅)d_G(s,v) + Ξ²\cdot W(s,v)$, where $W(s,v)$ is the weight of the heaviest edge on some shortest $s-v$ path. Hence our additive term depends linearly on a {\em local} maximum edge weight, as opposed to the global maximum edge weight in previous works. Finally, our $Ξ²= (1/Ο)^{O(1/Ο)}$. We also extend a centralized algorithm of Dor et al. \cite{DHZ00}. For a parameter $ΞΊ= 1,2,\ldots$, this algorithm provides for {\em unweighted} graphs a purely additive approximation of $2(ΞΊ-1)$ for {\em all pairs shortest paths} (APASP) in time $\tilde{O}(n^{2+1/ΞΊ})$. Within the same running time, our algorithm for {\em weighted} graphs provides a purely additive error of $2(ΞΊ- 1) W(u,v)$, for every vertex pair $(u,v) \in {V \choose 2}$, with $W(u,v)$ defined as above. On the way to these results we devise a suit of novel constructions of spanners, emulators and hopsets.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted