All About Phishing: Exploring User Research through a Systematic Literature Review

August 16, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium on Human Aspects of Information Security and Assurance

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sanchari Das, Andrew Kim, Zachary Tingle, Christena Nippert-Eng arXiv ID 1908.05897 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.CY, cs.HC Citations 46 Venue International Symposium on Human Aspects of Information Security and Assurance Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Phishing is a well-known cybersecurity attack that has rapidly increased in recent years. It poses legitimate risks to businesses, government agencies, and all users due to sensitive data breaches, subsequent financial and productivity losses, and social and personal inconvenience. Often, these attacks use social engineering techniques to deceive end-users, indicating the importance of user-focused studies to help prevent future attacks. We provide a detailed overview of phishing research that has focused on users by conducting a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed academic papers published in ACM Digital Library. Although published work on phishing appears in this data set as early as 2004, we found that of the total number of papers on phishing (N = 367) only 13.9% (n = 51) focus on users by employing user study methodologies such as interviews, surveys, and in-lab studies. Even within this small subset of papers, we note a striking lack of attention to reporting important information about methods and participants (e.g., the number and nature of participants), along with crucial recruitment biases in some of the research.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted