Information-Theoretic Lower Bounds for Compressive Sensing with Generative Models

August 28, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zhaoqiang Liu, Jonathan Scarlett arXiv ID 1908.10744 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Cross-listed cs.LG, eess.SP, math.ST, stat.ML Citations 42 Venue IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
It has recently been shown that for compressive sensing, significantly fewer measurements may be required if the sparsity assumption is replaced by the assumption the unknown vector lies near the range of a suitably-chosen generative model. In particular, in (Bora {\em et al.}, 2017) it was shown roughly $O(k\log L)$ random Gaussian measurements suffice for accurate recovery when the generative model is an $L$-Lipschitz function with bounded $k$-dimensional inputs, and $O(kd \log w)$ measurements suffice when the generative model is a $k$-input ReLU network with depth $d$ and width $w$. In this paper, we establish corresponding algorithm-independent lower bounds on the sample complexity using tools from minimax statistical analysis. In accordance with the above upper bounds, our results are summarized as follows: (i) We construct an $L$-Lipschitz generative model capable of generating group-sparse signals, and show that the resulting necessary number of measurements is $Ξ©(k \log L)$; (ii) Using similar ideas, we construct ReLU networks with high depth and/or high depth for which the necessary number of measurements scales as $Ξ©\big( kd \frac{\log w}{\log n}\big)$ (with output dimension $n$), and in some cases $Ξ©(kd \log w)$. As a result, we establish that the scaling laws derived in (Bora {\em et al.}, 2017) are optimal or near-optimal in the absence of further assumptions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted