Collaborative Policy Learning for Open Knowledge Graph Reasoning

August 31, 2019 Β· Entered Twilight Β· πŸ› Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

πŸŒ… TWILIGHT: Old Age
Predates the code-sharing era β€” a pioneer of its time

"Last commit was 6.0 years ago (β‰₯5 year threshold)"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Repo contents: F+N results.png, GFAWonly.sh, Joint.sh, LICENSE, README.md, U+P results.png, baselines, emnlp-gif.gif, fact-select.png, joint_trainer.py, nrekit, pure_GFAW.py, rl_code, test_pcnn.py

Authors Cong Fu, Tong Chen, Meng Qu, Woojeong Jin, Xiang Ren arXiv ID 1909.00230 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Cross-listed cs.CL, cs.LG Citations 63 Venue Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Repository https://github.com/shanzhenren/CPL ⭐ 58 Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a surge of interests in interpretable graph reasoning methods. However, these models often suffer from limited performance when working on sparse and incomplete graphs, due to the lack of evidential paths that can reach target entities. Here we study open knowledge graph reasoning---a task that aims to reason for missing facts over a graph augmented by a background text corpus. A key challenge of the task is to filter out "irrelevant" facts extracted from corpus, in order to maintain an effective search space during path inference. We propose a novel reinforcement learning framework to train two collaborative agents jointly, i.e., a multi-hop graph reasoner and a fact extractor. The fact extraction agent generates fact triples from corpora to enrich the graph on the fly; while the reasoning agent provides feedback to the fact extractor and guides it towards promoting facts that are helpful for the interpretable reasoning. Experiments on two public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Source code and datasets used in this paper can be downloaded at https://github.com/shanzhenren/CPL
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence