Deep Esophageal Clinical Target Volume Delineation using Encoded 3D Spatial Context of Tumors, Lymph Nodes, and Organs At Risk
September 04, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Dakai Jin, Dazhou Guo, Tsung-Ying Ho, Adam P. Harrison, Jing Xiao, Chen-kan Tseng, Le Lu
arXiv ID
1909.01526
Category
eess.IV: Image & Video Processing
Cross-listed
cs.CV
Citations
23
Venue
International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Clinical target volume (CTV) delineation from radiotherapy computed tomography (RTCT) images is used to define the treatment areas containing the gross tumor volume (GTV) and/or sub-clinical malignant disease for radiotherapy (RT). High intra- and inter-user variability makes this a particularly difficult task for esophageal cancer. This motivates automated solutions, which is the aim of our work. Because CTV delineation is highly context-dependent--it must encompass the GTV and regional lymph nodes (LNs) while also avoiding excessive exposure to the organs at risk (OARs)--we formulate it as a deep contextual appearance-based problem using encoded spatial contexts of these anatomical structures. This allows the deep network to better learn from and emulate the margin- and appearance-based delineation performed by human physicians. Additionally, we develop domain-specific data augmentation to inject robustness to our system. Finally, we show that a simple 3D progressive holistically nested network (PHNN), which avoids computationally heavy decoding paths while still aggregating features at different levels of context, can outperform more complicated networks. Cross-validated experiments on a dataset of 135 esophageal cancer patients demonstrate that our encoded spatial context approach can produce concrete performance improvements, with an average Dice score of 83.9% and an average surface distance of 4.2 mm, representing improvements of 3.8% and 2.4 mm, respectively, over the state-of-the-art approach.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Image & Video Processing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Kvasir-SEG: A Segmented Polyp Dataset
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification: An Overview
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: theory and applications
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Algorithm Unrolling: Interpretable, Efficient Deep Learning for Signal and Image Processing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ResUNet++: An Advanced Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted