Puncturable Signatures and Applications in Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Protocol

September 09, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Xinyu Li, Jing Xu, Xiong Fan, Yuchen Wang, Zhenfeng Zhang arXiv ID 1909.03955 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Citations 32 Venue IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Proof-of-stake blockchain protocols are becoming one of the most promising alternatives to the energy-consuming proof-of-work protocols. However, one particularly critical threat in the PoS setting is the well-known long-range attacks caused by secret key leakage (LRSL attack). Specifically, an adversary can attempt to control/compromise accounts possessing substantial stake at some past moment such that double-spend or erase past transactions, violating the fundamental persistence property of blockchain. Puncturable signatures provide a satisfying solution to construct practical proof-of-stake blockchain resilient to LRSL attack, despite of the fact that existent constructions are not efficient enough for practical deployments. In this paper, we provide an in-depth study of puncturable signatures and explore its applications in the proof-of-stake blockchain. We formalize a security model that allows the adversary for adaptive signing and puncturing queries, and show a construction with efficient puncturing operations based on the Bloom filter data structure and strong Diffie-Hellman assumption. The puncturing functionality we desire is for a particular part of message, like prefix, instead of the whole message. Furthermore, we use puncturable signatures to construct practical proof-of-stake blockchain protocols that are resilient to LRSL attack, while previously the forward-secure signature is used to immunize this attack. We implement our scheme and provide experimental results showing that in comparison with the forward-secure signature, our construction performs substantially better on signature size, signing and verification efficiency, significantly on key update efficiency.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted