LiveGraph: A Transactional Graph Storage System with Purely Sequential Adjacency List Scans

October 13, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Xiaowei Zhu, Guanyu Feng, Marco Serafini, Xiaosong Ma, Jiping Yu, Lei Xie, Ashraf Aboulnaga, Wenguang Chen arXiv ID 1910.05773 Category cs.DB: Databases Citations 48 Venue Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
The specific characteristics of graph workloads make it hard to design a one-size-fits-all graph storage system. Systems that support transactional updates use data structures with poor data locality, which limits the efficiency of analytical workloads or even simple edge scans. Other systems run graph analytics workloads efficiently, but cannot properly support transactions. This paper presents LiveGraph, a graph storage system that outperforms both the best graph transactional systems and the best systems for real-time graph analytics on fresh data. LiveGraph does that by ensuring that adjacency list scans, a key operation in graph workloads, are purely sequential: they never require random accesses even in presence of concurrent transactions. This is achieved by combining a novel graph-aware data structure, the Transactional Edge Log (TEL), together with a concurrency control mechanism that leverages TEL's data layout. Our evaluation shows that LiveGraph significantly outperforms state-of-the-art (graph) database solutions on both transactional and real-time analytical workloads.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Databases

R.I.P. ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted

Datasheets for Datasets

Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, ... (+5 more)

cs.DB ๐Ÿ› CACM ๐Ÿ“š 2.6K cites 8 years ago

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted