Improving the Sample and Communication Complexity for Decentralized Non-Convex Optimization: A Joint Gradient Estimation and Tracking Approach

October 13, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Machine Learning

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Haoran Sun, Songtao Lu, Mingyi Hong arXiv ID 1910.05857 Category math.OC: Optimization & Control Cross-listed cs.DC, cs.LG, eess.SP, stat.ML Citations 33 Venue International Conference on Machine Learning Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Many modern large-scale machine learning problems benefit from decentralized and stochastic optimization. Recent works have shown that utilizing both decentralized computing and local stochastic gradient estimates can outperform state-of-the-art centralized algorithms, in applications involving highly non-convex problems, such as training deep neural networks. In this work, we propose a decentralized stochastic algorithm to deal with certain smooth non-convex problems where there are $m$ nodes in the system, and each node has a large number of samples (denoted as $n$). Differently from the majority of the existing decentralized learning algorithms for either stochastic or finite-sum problems, our focus is given to both reducing the total communication rounds among the nodes, while accessing the minimum number of local data samples. In particular, we propose an algorithm named D-GET (decentralized gradient estimation and tracking), which jointly performs decentralized gradient estimation (which estimates the local gradient using a subset of local samples) and gradient tracking (which tracks the global full gradient using local estimates). We show that, to achieve certain $Ξ΅$ stationary solution of the deterministic finite sum problem, the proposed algorithm achieves an $\mathcal{O}(mn^{1/2}Ξ΅^{-1})$ sample complexity and an $\mathcal{O}(Ξ΅^{-1})$ communication complexity. These bounds significantly improve upon the best existing bounds of $\mathcal{O}(mnΞ΅^{-1})$ and $\mathcal{O}(Ξ΅^{-1})$, respectively. Similarly, for online problems, the proposed method achieves an $\mathcal{O}(m Ξ΅^{-3/2})$ sample complexity and an $\mathcal{O}(Ξ΅^{-1})$ communication complexity, while the best existing bounds are $\mathcal{O}(mΞ΅^{-2})$ and $\mathcal{O}(Ξ΅^{-2})$, respectively.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Optimization & Control

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted