Gradient penalty from a maximum margin perspective

October 15, 2019 Β· Entered Twilight Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸŒ… TWILIGHT: Old Age
Predates the code-sharing era β€” a pioneer of its time

"Last commit was 5.0 years ago (β‰₯5 year threshold)"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Repo contents: Code, LICENSE, README.md

Authors Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau, Ioannis Mitliagkas arXiv ID 1910.06922 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed stat.ML Citations 12 Venue arXiv.org Repository https://github.com/AlexiaJM/MaximumMarginGANs ⭐ 179 Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
A popular heuristic for improved performance in Generative adversarial networks (GANs) is to use some form of gradient penalty on the discriminator. This gradient penalty was originally motivated by a Wasserstein distance formulation. However, the use of gradient penalty in other GAN formulations is not well motivated. We present a unifying framework of expected margin maximization and show that a wide range of gradient-penalized GANs (e.g., Wasserstein, Standard, Least-Squares, and Hinge GANs) can be derived from this framework. Our results imply that employing gradient penalties induces a large-margin classifier (thus, a large-margin discriminator in GANs). We describe how expected margin maximization helps reduce vanishing gradients at fake (generated) samples, a known problem in GANs. From this framework, we derive a new $L^\infty$ gradient norm penalty with Hinge loss which generally produces equally good (or better) generated output in GANs than $L^2$-norm penalties (based on the FrΓ©chet Inception Distance).
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Machine Learning