Image Difficulty Curriculum for Generative Adversarial Networks (CuGAN)
October 20, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ IEEE Workshop/Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Petru Soviany, Claudiu Ardei, Radu Tudor Ionescu, Marius Leordeanu
arXiv ID
1910.08967
Category
cs.LG: Machine Learning
Cross-listed
cs.CV,
stat.ML
Citations
52
Venue
IEEE Workshop/Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Despite the significant advances in recent years, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are still notoriously hard to train. In this paper, we propose three novel curriculum learning strategies for training GANs. All strategies are first based on ranking the training images by their difficulty scores, which are estimated by a state-of-the-art image difficulty predictor. Our first strategy is to divide images into gradually more difficult batches. Our second strategy introduces a novel curriculum loss function for the discriminator that takes into account the difficulty scores of the real images. Our third strategy is based on sampling from an evolving distribution, which favors the easier images during the initial training stages and gradually converges to a uniform distribution, in which samples are equally likely, regardless of difficulty. We compare our curriculum learning strategies with the classic training procedure on two tasks: image generation and image translation. Our experiments indicate that all strategies provide faster convergence and superior results. For example, our best curriculum learning strategy applied on spectrally normalized GANs (SNGANs) fooled human annotators in thinking that generated CIFAR-like images are real in 25.0% of the presented cases, while the SNGANs trained using the classic procedure fooled the annotators in only 18.4% cases. Similarly, in image translation, the human annotators preferred the images produced by the Cycle-consistent GAN (CycleGAN) trained using curriculum learning in 40.5% cases and those produced by CycleGAN based on classic training in only 19.8% cases, 39.7% cases being labeled as ties.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Machine Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted