Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labels
October 31, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Curtis G. Northcutt, Lu Jiang, Isaac L. Chuang
arXiv ID
1911.00068
Category
stat.ML: Machine Learning (Stat)
Cross-listed
cs.LG
Citations
854
Venue
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
Learning exists in the context of data, yet notions of confidence typically focus on model predictions, not label quality. Confident learning (CL) is an alternative approach which focuses instead on label quality by characterizing and identifying label errors in datasets, based on the principles of pruning noisy data, counting with probabilistic thresholds to estimate noise, and ranking examples to train with confidence. Whereas numerous studies have developed these principles independently, here, we combine them, building on the assumption of a class-conditional noise process to directly estimate the joint distribution between noisy (given) labels and uncorrupted (unknown) labels. This results in a generalized CL which is provably consistent and experimentally performant. We present sufficient conditions where CL exactly finds label errors, and show CL performance exceeding seven recent competitive approaches for learning with noisy labels on the CIFAR dataset. Uniquely, the CL framework is not coupled to a specific data modality or model (e.g., we use CL to find several label errors in the presumed error-free MNIST dataset and improve sentiment classification on text data in Amazon Reviews). We also employ CL on ImageNet to quantify ontological class overlap (e.g., estimating 645 "missile" images are mislabeled as their parent class "projectile"), and moderately increase model accuracy (e.g., for ResNet) by cleaning data prior to training. These results are replicable using the open-source cleanlab release.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Machine Learning (Stat)
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Layer Normalization
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning with Differential Privacy
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted