A Benchmark Suite for Evaluating Caches' Vulnerability to Timing Attacks
November 19, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Shuwen Deng, Wenjie Xiong, Jakub Szefer
arXiv ID
1911.08619
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Citations
24
Venue
International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
Timing-based side or covert channels in processor caches continue to present a threat to computer systems, and they are the key to many of the recent Spectre and Meltdown attacks. Based on improvements to an existing three-step model for cache timing-based attacks, this work presents 88 Strong types of theoretical timing-based vulnerabilities in processor caches. To understand and evaluate all possible types of vulnerabilities in processor caches, this work further presents and implements a new benchmark suite which can be used to test to which types of cache timing-based attacks a given processor or cache design is vulnerable. In total, there are 1094 automatically-generated test programs which cover the 88 theoretical vulnerabilities. The benchmark suite generates the Cache Timing Vulnerability Score which can be used to evaluate how vulnerable a specific cache implementation is to different attacks. A smaller Cache Timing Vulnerability Score means the design is more secure, and the scores among different machines can be easily compared. Evaluation is conducted on commodity Intel and AMD processors and shows the differences in processor implementations can result in different types of attacks that they are vulnerable to. Beyond testing commodity processors, the benchmarks and the Cache Timing Vulnerability Score can be used to help designers of new secure processor caches evaluate their design's susceptibility to cache timing-based attacks.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted