Identifying Cognitive Radars -- Inverse Reinforcement Learning using Revealed Preferences

December 01, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Vikram Krishnamurthy, Daniel Angley, Robin Evans, William Moran arXiv ID 1912.00331 Category eess.SP: Signal Processing Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 37 Venue IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
We consider an inverse reinforcement learning problem involving us versus an enemy radar equipped with a Bayesian tracker. By observing the emissions of the enemy radar,how can we identify if the radar is cognitive (constrained utility maximizer)? Given the observed sequence of actions taken by the enemy's radar, we consider three problems: (i) Are the enemy radar's actions (waveform choice, beam scheduling) consistent with constrained utility maximization? If so how can we estimate the cognitive radar's utility function that is consistent with its actions. We formulate and solve the problem in terms of the spectra (eigenvalues) of the state and observation noise covariance matrices, and the algebraic Riccati equation. (ii) How to construct a statistical test for detecting a cognitive radar (constrained utility maximization) when we observe the radar's actions in noise or the radar observes our probe signal in noise? We propose a statistical detector with a tight Type-II error bound. (iii) How can we optimally probe (interrogate) the enemy's radar by choosing our state to minimize the Type-II error of detecting if the radar is deploying an economic rational strategy, subject to a constraint on the Type-I detection error? We present a stochastic optimization algorithm to optimize our probe signal. The main analysis framework used in this paper is that of revealed preferences from microeconomics.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Signal Processing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted