Deep learning-based survival prediction for multiple cancer types using histopathology images
December 16, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ PLoS ONE
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Ellery Wulczyn, David F. Steiner, Zhaoyang Xu, Apaar Sadhwani, Hongwu Wang, Isabelle Flament, Craig H. Mermel, Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen, Yun Liu, Martin C. Stumpe
arXiv ID
1912.07354
Category
q-bio.QM
Cross-listed
cs.LG,
eess.IV
Citations
237
Venue
PLoS ONE
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
Prognostic information at diagnosis has important implications for cancer treatment and monitoring. Although cancer staging, histopathological assessment, molecular features, and clinical variables can provide useful prognostic insights, improving risk stratification remains an active research area. We developed a deep learning system (DLS) to predict disease specific survival across 10 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We used a weakly-supervised approach without pixel-level annotations, and tested three different survival loss functions. The DLS was developed using 9,086 slides from 3,664 cases and evaluated using 3,009 slides from 1,216 cases. In multivariable Cox regression analysis of the combined cohort including all 10 cancers, the DLS was significantly associated with disease specific survival (hazard ratio of 1.58, 95% CI 1.28-1.70, p<0.0001) after adjusting for cancer type, stage, age, and sex. In a per-cancer adjusted subanalysis, the DLS remained a significant predictor of survival in 5 of 10 cancer types. Compared to a baseline model including stage, age, and sex, the c-index of the model demonstrated an absolute 3.7% improvement (95% CI 1.0-6.5) in the combined cohort. Additionally, our models stratified patients within individual cancer stages, particularly stage II (p=0.025) and stage III (p<0.001). By developing and evaluating prognostic models across multiple cancer types, this work represents one of the most comprehensive studies exploring the direct prediction of clinical outcomes using deep learning and histopathology images. Our analysis demonstrates the potential for this approach to provide prognostic information in multiple cancer types, and even within specific pathologic stages. However, given the relatively small number of clinical events, we observed wide confidence intervals, suggesting that future work will benefit from larger datasets.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ q-bio.QM
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
GuacaMol: Benchmarking Models for De Novo Molecular Design
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
DeepConv-DTI: Prediction of drug-target interactions via deep learning with convolution on protein sequences
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
ProtVec: A Continuous Distributed Representation of Biological Sequences
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
A Perspective on Deep Imaging
R.I.P.
๐
404 Not Found
Deep learning in bioinformatics: introduction, application, and perspective in big data era
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted