User Acceptance of Usable Blockchain-Based Research Data Sharing System: An Extended TAM Based Study
December 14, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Ajay Kumar Shrestha, Julita Vassileva
arXiv ID
2001.00079
Category
cs.CY: Computers & Society
Cross-listed
cs.CR,
cs.GT
Citations
51
Venue
International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Blockchain technology has evolved as a promising means to transform data management models in many domains including healthcare, agricultural research, tourism domains etc. In the research community, a usable blockchain-based system can allow users to create a proof of ownership and provenance of the research work, share research data without losing control and ownership of it, provide incentives for sharing and give users full transparency and control over who access their data, when and for what purpose. The initial adoption of such blockchain-based systems is necessary for continued use of the services, but their user acceptance behavioral model has not been well investigated in the literature. In this paper, we take the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a foundation and extend the external constructs to uncover how the perceived ease of use, perceived usability, quality of the system and perceived enjoyment influence the intention to use the blockchain-based system. We based our study on user evaluation of a prototype of a blockchain-based research data sharing framework using a TAM validated questionnaire. Our results show that, overall, all the individual constructs of the behavior model significantly influence the intention to use the system while their collective effect is found to be insignificant. The quality of the system and the perceived enjoyment have stronger influence on the perceived usefulness. However, the effect of perceived ease of use on the perceived usefulness is not supported. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Computers & Society
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelines
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Green AI
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted