Simulation of Turbulent Flow around a Generic High-Speed Train using Hybrid Models of RANS Numerical Method with Machine Learning
December 25, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Alireza Hajipour, Arash Mirabdolah Lavasani, Mohammad Eftekhari Yazdi, Amir Mosavi, Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Kwok-Wing Chau
arXiv ID
2001.01569
Category
physics.flu-dyn
Cross-listed
cs.LG,
stat.ML
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
In the present paper, an aerodynamic investigation of a high-speed train is performed. In the first section of this article, a generic high-speed train against a turbulent flow is simulated, numerically. The Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations combined with the turbulence model are applied to solve incompressible turbulent flow around a high-speed train. Flow structure, velocity and pressure contours and streamlines at some typical wind directions are the most important results of this simulation. The maximum and minimum values are specified and discussed. Also, the pressure coefficient for some critical points on the train surface is evaluated. In the following, the wind direction influence the aerodynamic key parameters as drag, lift, and side forces at the mentioned wind directions are analyzed and compared. Moreover, the effects of velocity changes (50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 m/s) are estimated and compared on the above flow and aerodynamic parameters. In the second section of the paper, various data-driven methods including Gene Expression Programming (GEP), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and random forest (RF), are applied for predicting output parameters. So, drag, lift, and side forces and also minimum and a maximum of pressure coefficients for mentioned wind directions and velocity are predicted and compared using statistical parameters. Obtained results indicated that RF in all coefficients of wind direction and most coefficients of free stream velocity provided the most accurate predictions. As a conclusion, RF may be recommended for the prediction of aerodynamic coefficients.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ physics.flu-dyn
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
NVIDIA SimNet^{TM}: an AI-accelerated multi-physics simulation framework
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Teaching the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations to Fast Neural Surrogate Models in 3D
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Prediction of Reynolds Stresses in High-Mach-Number Turbulent Boundary Layers using Physics-Informed Machine Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
From Deep to Physics-Informed Learning of Turbulence: Diagnostics
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted