Four Years in Review: Statistical Practices of Likert Scales in Human-Robot Interaction Studies

January 09, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE/ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mariah L. Schrum, Michael Johnson, Muyleng Ghuy, Matthew C. Gombolay arXiv ID 2001.03231 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.RO, stat.AP, stat.ME Citations 88 Venue IEEE/ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
As robots become more prevalent, the importance of the field of human-robot interaction (HRI) grows accordingly. As such, we should endeavor to employ the best statistical practices. Likert scales are commonly used metrics in HRI to measure perceptions and attitudes. Due to misinformation or honest mistakes, most HRI researchers do not adopt best practices when analyzing Likert data. We conduct a review of psychometric literature to determine the current standard for Likert scale design and analysis. Next, we conduct a survey of four years of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (2016 through 2019) and report on incorrect statistical practices and design of Likert scales. During these years, only 3 of the 110 papers applied proper statistical testing to correctly-designed Likert scales. Our analysis suggests there are areas for meaningful improvement in the design and testing of Likert scales. Lastly, we provide recommendations to improve the accuracy of conclusions drawn from Likert data.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted