Combinatorial Semi-Bandit in the Non-Stationary Environment

February 10, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Wei Chen, Liwei Wang, Haoyu Zhao, Kai Zheng arXiv ID 2002.03580 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.DS, cs.GT, stat.ML Citations 25 Venue Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the non-stationary combinatorial semi-bandit problem, both in the switching case and in the dynamic case. In the general case where (a) the reward function is non-linear, (b) arms may be probabilistically triggered, and (c) only approximate offline oracle exists \cite{wang2017improving}, our algorithm achieves $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{\mathcal{S} T})$ distribution-dependent regret in the switching case, and $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\mathcal{V}^{1/3}T^{2/3})$ in the dynamic case, where $\mathcal S$ is the number of switchings and $\mathcal V$ is the sum of the total ``distribution changes''. The regret bounds in both scenarios are nearly optimal, but our algorithm needs to know the parameter $\mathcal S$ or $\mathcal V$ in advance. We further show that by employing another technique, our algorithm no longer needs to know the parameters $\mathcal S$ or $\mathcal V$ but the regret bounds could become suboptimal. In a special case where the reward function is linear and we have an exact oracle, we design a parameter-free algorithm that achieves nearly optimal regret both in the switching case and in the dynamic case without knowing the parameters in advance.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted