Testing of Support Tools for Plagiarism Detection

February 11, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors TomΓ‘Ε‘ FoltΓ½nek, Dita DlabolovΓ‘, Alla Anohina-Naumeca, Salim RazΔ±, JΓΊlius Kravjar, Laima Kamzola, Jean Guerrero-Dib, Γ–zgΓΌr Γ‡elik, Debora Weber-Wulff arXiv ID 2002.04279 Category cs.DL: Digital Libraries Cross-listed cs.IR Citations 100 Venue International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
There is a general belief that software must be able to easily do things that humans find difficult. Since finding sources for plagiarism in a text is not an easy task, there is a wide-spread expectation that it must be simple for software to determine if a text is plagiarized or not. Software cannot determine plagiarism, but it can work as a support tool for identifying some text similarity that may constitute plagiarism. But how well do the various systems work? This paper reports on a collaborative test of 15 web-based text-matching systems that can be used when plagiarism is suspected. It was conducted by researchers from seven countries using test material in eight different languages, evaluating the effectiveness of the systems on single-source and multi-source documents. A usability examination was also performed. The sobering results show that although some systems can indeed help identify some plagiarized content, they clearly do not find all plagiarism and at times also identify non-plagiarized material as problematic.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Digital Libraries

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted