Testing of Support Tools for Plagiarism Detection
February 11, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
TomΓ‘Ε‘ FoltΓ½nek, Dita DlabolovΓ‘, Alla Anohina-Naumeca, Salim RazΔ±, JΓΊlius Kravjar, Laima Kamzola, Jean Guerrero-Dib, ΓzgΓΌr Γelik, Debora Weber-Wulff
arXiv ID
2002.04279
Category
cs.DL: Digital Libraries
Cross-listed
cs.IR
Citations
100
Venue
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
There is a general belief that software must be able to easily do things that humans find difficult. Since finding sources for plagiarism in a text is not an easy task, there is a wide-spread expectation that it must be simple for software to determine if a text is plagiarized or not. Software cannot determine plagiarism, but it can work as a support tool for identifying some text similarity that may constitute plagiarism. But how well do the various systems work? This paper reports on a collaborative test of 15 web-based text-matching systems that can be used when plagiarism is suspected. It was conducted by researchers from seven countries using test material in eight different languages, evaluating the effectiveness of the systems on single-source and multi-source documents. A usability examination was also performed. The sobering results show that although some systems can indeed help identify some plagiarized content, they clearly do not find all plagiarism and at times also identify non-plagiarized material as problematic.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Digital Libraries
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Open Access Advantage Considering Citation, Article Usage and Social Media Attention
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Bibliometric Review of Large Language Models Research from 2017 to 2023
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
On the Performance of Hybrid Search Strategies for Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Systematic Identification and Analysis of Scientists on Twitter
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted