Analyzing Grant-Free Access for URLLC Service
February 18, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yan Liu, Yansha Deng, Maged Elkashlan, Arumugam Nallanathan, George K. Karagiannidis
arXiv ID
2002.07842
Category
eess.SP: Signal Processing
Cross-listed
cs.NI
Citations
143
Venue
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
5G New Radio (NR) is expected to support new ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC) service targeting at supporting the small packets transmissions with very stringent latency and reliability requirements. Current Long Term Evolution (LTE) system has been designed based on grantbased (GB) (i.e., dynamic grant) random access, which can hardly support the URLLC requirements. Grant-free (GF) (i.e., configured grant) access is proposed as a feasible and promising technology to meet such requirements, especially for uplink transmissions, which effectively saves the time of requesting/waiting for a grant. While some basic GF access features have been proposed and standardized in NR Release-15, there is still much space to improve. Being proposed as 3GPP study items, three GF access schemes with Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuest (HARQ) retransmissions including Reactive, K-repetition, and Proactive, are analyzed in this paper. Specifically, we present a spatiotemporal analytical framework for the contention-based GF access analysis. Based on this framework, we define the latent access failure probability to characterize URLLC reliability and latency performances. We propose a tractable approach to derive and analyze the latent access failure probability of the typical UE under three GF HARQ schemes. Our results show that under shorter latency constraints, the Proactive scheme provides the lowest latent access failure probability, whereas, under longer latency constraints, the K-repetition scheme achieves the lowest latent access failure probability, which depends on K. If K is overestimated, the Proactive scheme provides lower latent access failure probability than the K-repetition scheme.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Signal Processing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
π
π
The Cartographer
1D Convolutional Neural Networks and Applications: A Survey
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Wireless Communications with Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface: Path Loss Modeling and Experimental Measurement
π
π
The Cartographer
Accessing From The Sky: A Tutorial on UAV Communications for 5G and Beyond
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
6G Wireless Systems: Vision, Requirements, Challenges, Insights, and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A New Wireless Communication Paradigm through Software-controlled Metasurfaces
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted