Dynamic Set Cover: Improved Amortized and Worst-Case Update Time

February 25, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sayan Bhattacharya, Monika Henzinger, Danupon Nanongkai, Xiaowei Wu arXiv ID 2002.11171 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 14 Venue ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
In the dynamic minimum set cover problem, a challenge is to minimize the update time while guaranteeing close to the optimal $\min(O(\log n), f)$ approximation factor. (Throughout, $m$, $n$, $f$, and $C$ are parameters denoting the maximum number of sets, number of elements, frequency, and the cost range.) In the high-frequency range, when $f=Ξ©(\log n)$, this was achieved by a deterministic $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm with $O(f \log n)$ amortized update time [Gupta et al. STOC'17]. In the low-frequency range, the line of work by Gupta et al. [STOC'17], Abboud et al. [STOC'19], and Bhattacharya et al. [ICALP'15, IPCO'17, FOCS'19] led to a deterministic $(1+Ξ΅)f$-approximation algorithm with $O(f \log (Cn)/Ξ΅^2)$ amortized update time. In this paper we improve the latter update time and provide the first bounds that subsume (and sometimes improve) the state-of-the-art dynamic vertex cover algorithms. We obtain: 1. $(1+Ξ΅)f$-approximation ratio in $O(f\log^2 (Cn)/Ξ΅^3)$ worst-case update time: No non-trivial worst-case update time was previously known for dynamic set cover. Our bound subsumes and improves by a logarithmic factor the $O(\log^3 n/\text{poly}(Ξ΅))$ worst-case update time for unweighted dynamic vertex cover (i.e., when $f=2$ and $C=1$) by Bhattacharya et al. [SODA'17]. 2. $(1+Ξ΅)f$-approximation ratio in $O\left((f^2/Ξ΅^3)+(f/Ξ΅^2) \log C\right)$ amortized update time: This result improves the previous $O(f \log (Cn)/Ξ΅^2)$ update time bound for most values of $f$ in the low-frequency range, i.e. whenever $f=o(\log n)$. It is the first that is independent of $m$ and $n$. It subsumes the constant amortized update time of Bhattacharya and Kulkarni [SODA'19] for unweighted dynamic vertex cover (i.e., when $f = 2$ and $C = 1$).
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted