The Fine-Grained Complexity of Computing the Tutte Polynomial of a Linear Matroid

We show that computing the Tutte polynomial of a linear matroid of dimension $k$ on $k^{O(1)}$ points over a field of $k^{O(1)}$ elements requires $k^{Ω(k)}$ time unless the \#ETH---a counting extension of the Exponential Time Hypothesis of Impagliazzo and Paturi [CCC 1999] due to Dell {\em et al.} [ACM TALG 2014]---is false. This holds also for linear matroids that admit a representation where every point is associated to a vector with at most two nonzero coordinates. We also show that the same is true for computing the Tutte polynomial of a binary matroid of dimension $k$ on $k^{O(1)}$ points with at most three nonzero coordinates in each point's vector. This is in sharp contrast to computing the Tutte polynomial of a $k$-vertex graph (that is, the Tutte polynomial of a {\em graphic} matroid of dimension $k$---which is representable in dimension $k$ over the binary field so that every vector has two nonzero coordinates), which is known to be computable in $2^k k^{O(1)}$ time [Björklund {\em et al.}, FOCS 2008]. Our lower-bound proofs proceed via (i) a connection due to Crapo and Rota [1970] between the number of tuples of codewords of full support and the Tutte polynomial of the matroid associated with the code; (ii) an earlier-established \#ETH-hardness of counting the solutions to a bipartite $(d,2)$-CSP on $n$ vertices in $d^{o(n)}$ time; and (iii) new embeddings of such CSP instances as questions about codewords of full support in a linear code. We complement these lower bounds with two algorithm designs. The first design computes the Tutte polynomial of a linear matroid of dimension~$k$ on $k^{O(1)}$ points in $k^{O(k)}$ operations. The second design generalizes the Björklund~{\em et al.} algorithm and runs in $q^{k+1}k^{O(1)}$ time for linear matroids of dimension $k$ defined over the $q$-element field by $k^{O(1)}$ points with at most two nonzero coordinates each.