Influence of Initialization on the Performance of Metaheuristic Optimizers
March 08, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Applied Soft Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Qian Li, San-Yang Liu, Xin-She Yang
arXiv ID
2003.03789
Category
cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary
Cross-listed
cs.LG,
math.OC
Citations
135
Venue
Applied Soft Computing
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
All metaheuristic optimization algorithms require some initialization, and the initialization for such optimizers is usually carried out randomly. However, initialization can have some significant influence on the performance of such algorithms. This paper presents a systematic comparison of 22 different initialization methods on the convergence and accuracy of five optimizers: differential evolution (DE), particle swarm optimization (PSO), cuckoo search (CS), artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm and genetic algorithm (GA). We have used 19 different test functions with different properties and modalities to compare the possible effects of initialization, population sizes and the numbers of iterations. Rigorous statistical ranking tests indicate that 43.37\% of the functions using the DE algorithm show significant differences for different initialization methods, while 73.68\% of the functions using both PSO and CS algorithms are significantly affected by different initialization methods. The simulations show that DE is less sensitive to initialization, while both PSO and CS are more sensitive to initialization. In addition, under the condition of the same maximum number of function evaluations (FEs), the population size can also have a strong effect. Particle swarm optimization usually requires a larger population, while the cuckoo search needs only a small population size. Differential evolution depends more heavily on the number of iterations, a relatively small population with more iterations can lead to better results. Furthermore, ABC is more sensitive to initialization, while such initialization has little effect on GA. Some probability distributions such as the beta distribution, exponential distribution and Rayleigh distribution can usually lead to better performance. The implications of this study and further research topics are also discussed in detail.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Neural & Evolutionary
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Learning using Rectified Linear Units (ReLU)
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Generative Adversarial Text to Image Synthesis
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Search
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learning
๐
๐
Old Age
Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networks
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted