Co-channel Coexistence: Let ITS-G5 and Sidelink C-V2X Make Peace

March 20, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› 2020 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Microwaves for Intelligent Mobility (ICMIM)

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Alessandro Bazzi, Alberto Zanella, Ioannis Sarris, Vincent Martinez arXiv ID 2003.09510 Category cs.NI: Networking & Internet Citations 20 Venue 2020 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Microwaves for Intelligent Mobility (ICMIM) Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
In the last few years, two technologies have been developed to enable direct exchange of information between vehicles. These technologies, currently seen as alternatives, are ITS-G5, as commonly referred in Europe, and sidelink LTE-vehicle-to-everything (LTE-V2X) (one of the solutions of the so-called cellular-V2X, C-V2X). For this reason, the attention has been mostly concentrated on comparing them and remarking their strengths and weaknesses to motivate a choice. Differently, in this work we focus on a scenario where both are used in the same area and using the same frequency channels, without the assistance from any infrastructure. Our results show that under co-channel coexistence the range of ITS-G5 is severely degraded, while impact on LTE-V2X is marginal. Additionally, a mitigation method where the CAM data generation is constrained to periodical intervals is shown to reduce the impact of co-channel coexistence, with less degradation on ITS-G5 performance and even improvement for LTE-V2X.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Networking & Internet

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted