Robust Beamforming Design for Sum Secrecy Rate Optimization in MU-MISO Networks

March 24, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Pu Zhao, Meng Zhang, Hui Yu, Hanwen Luo, Wen Chen arXiv ID 2003.10676 Category eess.SP: Signal Processing Cross-listed cs.IT Citations 64 Venue IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
This paper studies the beamforming design problem of a multi-user downlink network, assuming imperfect channel state information known to the base station. In this scenario, the base station is equipped with multiple antennas, and each user is wiretapped by a specific eavesdropper where each user or eavesdropper is equipped with one antenna. It is supposed that the base station employs transmit beamforming with a given requirement on sum transmitting power. The objective is to maximize the sum secrecy rate of the network. Due to the uncertainty of the channel, it is difficult to calculate the exact sum secrecy rate of the system. Thus, the maximum of lower bound of sum secrecy rate is considered. The optimization of the lower bound of sum secrecy rate still makes the considered beamforming design problem difficult to handle. To solve this problem, a beamforming design scheme is proposed to transform the original problem into a convex approximation problem, by employing semidefinite relaxation and first-order approximation technique based on Taylor expansion. Besides, with the advantage of low complexity, a zero-forcing based beamforming method is presented in the case that base station is able to nullify the eavesdroppers' rate. When the base station doesn't have the ability, user selection algorithm would be in use. Numerical results show that the former strategy achieves better performance than the latter one, which is mainly due to the ability of optimizing beamforming direction, and both outperform the signal-to-leakage-and-noise ratio based algorithm.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Signal Processing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted