Parallel Batch-Dynamic $k$-Clique Counting
March 30, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π SIAM Symposium on Algorithmic Principles of Computer Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Laxman Dhulipala, Quanquan C. Liu, Julian Shun, Shangdi Yu
arXiv ID
2003.13585
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.DC
Citations
31
Venue
SIAM Symposium on Algorithmic Principles of Computer Systems
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
In this paper, we study new batch-dynamic algorithms for the $k$-clique counting problem, which are dynamic algorithms where the updates are batches of edge insertions and deletions. We study this problem in the parallel setting, where the goal is to obtain algorithms with low (polylogarithmic) depth. Our first result is a new parallel batch-dynamic triangle counting algorithm with $O(Ξ\sqrt{Ξ+m})$ amortized work and $O(\log^* (Ξ+m))$ depth with high probability, and $O(Ξ+m)$ space for a batch of $Ξ$ edge insertions or deletions. Our second result is an algebraic algorithm based on parallel fast matrix multiplication. Assuming that a parallel fast matrix multiplication algorithm exists with parallel matrix multiplication constant $Ο_p$, the same algorithm solves dynamic $k$-clique counting with $O\left(\min\left(Ξm^{\frac{(2k - 1)Ο_p}{3(Ο_p + 1)}}, (Ξ+m)^{\frac{2(k + 1)Ο_p}{3(Ο_p + 1)}}\right)\right)$ amortized work and $O(\log (Ξ+m))$ depth with high probability, and $O\left((Ξ+m)^{\frac{2(k + 1)Ο_p}{3(Ο_p + 1)}}\right)$ space. Using a recently developed parallel $k$-clique counting algorithm, we also obtain a simple batch-dynamic algorithm for $k$-clique counting on graphs with arboricity $Ξ±$ running in $O(Ξ(m+Ξ)Ξ±^{k-4})$ expected work and $O(\log^{k-2} n)$ depth with high probability, and $O(m + Ξ)$ space. Finally, we present a multicore CPU implementation of our parallel batch-dynamic triangle counting algorithm. On a 72-core machine with two-way hyper-threading, our implementation achieves 36.54--74.73x parallel speedup, and in certain cases achieves significant speedups over existing parallel algorithms for the problem, which are not theoretically-efficient.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted