An Early Benchmark of Quality of Experience Between HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 using Lighthouse

April 04, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Darius Saif, Chung-Horng Lung, Ashraf Matrawy arXiv ID 2004.01978 Category cs.NI: Networking & Internet Citations 37 Venue ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Google's QUIC (GQUIC) is an emerging transport protocol designed to reduce HTTP latency. Deployed across its platforms and positioned as an alternative to TCP+TLS, GQUIC is feature rich: offering reliable data transmission and secure communication. It addresses TCP+TLS's (i) Head of Line Blocking (HoLB), (ii) excessive round-trip times on connection establishment, and (iii) entrenchment. Efforts by the IETF are in progress to standardize the next generation of HTTP's (HTTP/3, or H3) delivery, with their own variant of QUIC. While performance benchmarks have been conducted between GQUIC and HTTP/2-over-TCP (H2), no such analysis to our knowledge has taken place between H2 and H3. In addition, past studies rely on Page Load Time as their main, if not only, metric. The purpose of this work is to benchmark the latest draft specification of H3 and dig further into a user's Quality of Experience (QoE) using Lighthouse: an open source (and metric diverse) auditing tool. Our findings show that, for one of H3's early implementations, H3 is mostly worse but achieves a higher average throughput
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Networking & Internet

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted