Responsive Parallelism with Futures and State
April 06, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ ACM-SIGPLAN Symposium on Programming Language Design and Implementation
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Stefan K. Muller, Kyle Singer, Noah Goldstein, Umut A. Acar, Kunal Agrawal, I-Ting Angelina Lee
arXiv ID
2004.02870
Category
cs.PL: Programming Languages
Citations
12
Venue
ACM-SIGPLAN Symposium on Programming Language Design and Implementation
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Motivated by the increasing shift to multicore computers, recent work has developed language support for responsive parallel applications that mix compute-intensive tasks with latency-sensitive, usually interactive, tasks. These developments include calculi that allow assigning priorities to threads, type systems that can rule out priority inversions, and accompanying cost models for predicting responsiveness. These advances share one important limitation: all of this work assumes purely functional programming. This is a significant restriction, because many realistic interactive applications, from games to robots to web servers, use mutable state, e.g., for communication between threads. In this paper, we lift the restriction concerning the use of state. We present $ฮป_i^4$, a calculus with implicit parallelism in the form of prioritized futures and mutable state in the form of references. Because both futures and references are first-class values, $ฮป_i^4$ programs can exhibit complex dependencies, including interaction between threads and with the external world (users, network, etc). To reason about the responsiveness of $ฮป_i^4$ programs, we extend traditional graph-based cost models for parallelism to account for dependencies created via mutable state, and we present a type system to outlaw priority inversions that can lead to unbounded blocking. We show that these techniques are practical by implementing them in C++ and present an empirical evaluation.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Programming Languages
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Tensor Comprehensions: Framework-Agnostic High-Performance Machine Learning Abstractions
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Glow: Graph Lowering Compiler Techniques for Neural Networks
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Learnable Programming: Blocks and Beyond
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Scenic: A Language for Scenario Specification and Scene Generation
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Vandal: A Scalable Security Analysis Framework for Smart Contracts
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted