Graph Matching with Partially-Correct Seeds

April 08, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Journal of machine learning research

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Liren Yu, Jiaming Xu, Xiaojun Lin arXiv ID 2004.03816 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DM, stat.ML Citations 18 Venue Journal of machine learning research Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Graph matching aims to find the latent vertex correspondence between two edge-correlated graphs and has found numerous applications across different fields. In this paper, we study a seeded graph matching problem, which assumes that a set of seeds, i.e., pre-mapped vertex-pairs, is given in advance. While most previous work requires all seeds to be correct, we focus on the setting where the seeds are partially correct. Specifically, consider two correlated graphs whose edges are sampled independently from a parent \ER graph $\mathcal{G}(n,p)$. A mapping between the vertices of the two graphs is provided as seeds, of which an unknown $Ξ²$ fraction is correct. We first analyze a simple algorithm that matches vertices based on the number of common seeds in the $1$-hop neighborhoods, and then further propose a new algorithm that uses seeds in the $2$-hop neighborhoods. We establish non-asymptotic performance guarantees of perfect matching for both $1$-hop and $2$-hop algorithms, showing that our new $2$-hop algorithm requires substantially fewer correct seeds than the $1$-hop algorithm when graphs are sparse. Moreover, by combining our new performance guarantees for the $1$-hop and $2$-hop algorithms, we attain the best-known results (in terms of the required fraction of correct seeds) across the entire range of graph sparsity and significantly improve the previous results in \cite{10.14778/2794367.2794371,lubars2018correcting} when $p\ge n^{-5/6}$. For instance, when $p$ is a constant or $p=n^{-3/4}$, we show that only $Ξ©(\sqrt{n\log n})$ correct seeds suffice for perfect matching, while the previously best-known results demand $Ξ©(n)$ and $Ξ©(n^{3/4}\log n)$ correct seeds, respectively. Numerical experiments corroborate our theoretical findings, demonstrating the superiority of our $2$-hop algorithm on a variety of synthetic and real graphs.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted