Efficacy of the FDA nozzle benchmark and the lattice Boltzmann method for the analysis of biomedical flows in transitional regime
May 14, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Kartik Jain
arXiv ID
2005.07119
Category
physics.flu-dyn
Cross-listed
cs.DC,
nlin.CG,
physics.bio-ph
Citations
20
Venue
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
Flows through medical devices as well as in anatomical vessels despite being at moderate Reynolds number may exhibit transitional or even turbulent character. In order to validate numerical methods and codes used for biomedical flow computations, the U.S. food and drug administration (FDA) established an experimental benchmark, which was a pipe with gradual contraction and sudden expansion representing a nozzle. The experimental results for various Reynolds numbers ranging from 500 to 6500 were publicly released. Previous and recent computational investigations of flow in the FDA nozzle found limitations in various CFD approaches and some even questioned the adequacy of the benchmark itself. This communication reports the results of a lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) based direct numerical simulation (DNS) approach applied to the FDA nozzle benchmark for transitional cases of Reynolds numbers 2000 and 3500. The goal is to evaluate if a simple off the shelf LBM would predict the experimental results without the use of complex models or synthetic turbulence at the inflow. LBM computations with various spatial and temporal resolutions are performed - in the extremities of 44 million to 2.8 billion lattice cells - conducted respectively on 32 CPU cores of a desktop to more than 300'000 cores of a modern supercomputer to explore and characterize miniscule flow details and quantify Kolmogorov scales. The LBM simulations transition to turbulence at a Reynolds number 2000 like the FDA's experiments and acceptable agreement in jet breakdown locations, average velocity, shear stress and pressure is found for both the Reynolds numbers.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ physics.flu-dyn
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
NVIDIA SimNet^{TM}: an AI-accelerated multi-physics simulation framework
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Teaching the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations to Fast Neural Surrogate Models in 3D
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Prediction of Reynolds Stresses in High-Mach-Number Turbulent Boundary Layers using Physics-Informed Machine Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
From Deep to Physics-Informed Learning of Turbulence: Diagnostics
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted