Selecting third-party libraries: The practitioners' perspective
May 26, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Enrique Larios-Vargas, MaurΓcio Aniche, Christoph Treude, Magiel Bruntink, Georgios Gousios
arXiv ID
2005.12574
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Citations
79
Venue
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
The selection of third-party libraries is an essential element of virtually any software development project. However, deciding which libraries to choose is a challenging practical problem. Selecting the wrong library can severely impact a software project in terms of cost, time, and development effort, with the severity of the impact depending on the role of the library in the software architecture, among others. Despite the importance of following a careful library selection process, in practice, the selection of third-party libraries is still conducted in an ad-hoc manner, where dozens of factors play an influential role in the decision. In this paper, we study the factors that influence the selection process of libraries, as perceived by industry developers. To that aim, we perform a cross-sectional interview study with 16 developers from 11 different businesses and survey 115 developers that are involved in the selection of libraries. We systematically devised a comprehensive set of 26 technical, human, and economic factors that developers take into consideration when selecting a software library. Eight of these factors are new to the literature. We explain each of these factors and how they play a role in the decision. Finally, we discuss the implications of our work to library maintainers, potential library users, package manager developers, and empirical software engineering researchers.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
GraphCodeBERT: Pre-training Code Representations with Data Flow
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Cars
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Devign: Effective Vulnerability Identification by Learning Comprehensive Program Semantics via Graph Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted