Fast Algorithms for Join Operations on Tree Decompositions

June 02, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Treewidth, Kernels, and Algorithms

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Johan M. M. van Rooij arXiv ID 2006.01588 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 10 Venue Treewidth, Kernels, and Algorithms Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Treewidth is a measure of how tree-like a graph is. It has many important algorithmic applications because many NP-hard problems on general graphs become tractable when restricted to graphs of bounded treewidth. Algorithms for problems on graphs of bounded treewidth mostly are dynamic programming algorithms using the structure of a tree decomposition of the graph. The bottleneck in the worst-case run time of these algorithms often is the computations for the so called join nodes in the associated nice tree decomposition. In this paper, we review two different approaches that have appeared in the literature about computations for the join nodes: one using fast zeta and MΓΆbius transforms and one using fast Fourier transforms. We combine these approaches to obtain new, faster algorithms for a broad class of vertex subset problems known as the [Οƒ,ρ]-domination problems. Our main result is that we show how to solve [Οƒ,ρ]-domination problems in $O(s^{t+2} t n^2 (t\log(s)+\log(n)))$ arithmetic operations. Here, t is the treewidth, s is the (fixed) number of states required to represent partial solutions of the specific [Οƒ,ρ]-domination problem, and n is the number of vertices in the graph. This reduces the polynomial factors involved compared to the previously best time bound (van Rooij, Bodlaender, Rossmanith, ESA 2009) of $O( s^{t+2} (st)^{2(s-2)} n^3 )$ arithmetic operations. In particular, this removes the dependence of the degree of the polynomial on the fixed number of states~$s$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted